HRI ethics and type-token ambiguity: what kind of robotic identity is most responsible?


Journal article


Thomas Arnold, Matthias Scheutz
Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 22, Springer Netherlands Dordrecht, 2020, pp. 357--366

Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Arnold, T., & Scheutz, M. (2020). HRI ethics and type-token ambiguity: what kind of robotic identity is most responsible? Ethics and Information Technology, 22, 357–366.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Arnold, Thomas, and Matthias Scheutz. “HRI Ethics and Type-Token Ambiguity: What Kind of Robotic Identity Is Most Responsible?” Ethics and Information Technology 22 (2020): 357–366.


MLA   Click to copy
Arnold, Thomas, and Matthias Scheutz. “HRI Ethics and Type-Token Ambiguity: What Kind of Robotic Identity Is Most Responsible?” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 22, Springer Netherlands Dordrecht, 2020, pp. 357–66.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{arnold2020a,
  title = {HRI ethics and type-token ambiguity: what kind of robotic identity is most responsible?},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {Ethics and Information Technology},
  pages = {357--366},
  publisher = {Springer Netherlands Dordrecht},
  volume = {22},
  author = {Arnold, Thomas and Scheutz, Matthias}
}